TN Government Challenges SC Ruling on PG Courses Domicile Reservations

 

 

The TN Government has challenged the recent Supreme Court verdict declaring PG Courses Domicile Reservations in specialized and higher education, including postgraduate (PG) medical courses, unconstitutional. The state government plans to file a review petition to assert its rights and uphold social justice. The decision affects the state's long-standing reservation policies, which include a 69% quota and in-service quotas for medical admissions. 

Background of the Supreme Court Verdict

 

On January 29, 2025, the Supreme Court ruled that PG Courses Domicile Reservations violate Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. The bench, comprising Justices Hrishikesh Roy, Sudhanshu Dhulia, and SVN Bhatti, observed that such reservations restrict equal opportunities for all Indian citizens. The ruling specifically mentioned that the state quota for PG medical seats must be filled based on merit in the NEET PG exam. 

 

Key Points from the Supreme Court Ruling

The Supreme Court also referenced the Constituent Assembly debates, which stated that residence in a state should not be a criterion for government jobs or educational admissions.

TN Government's Response 

 

State Health Minister Ma Subramanian expressed concerns over the ruling, stating that it directly impacts TN Government's reservation policies, including:

• 69% reservation in government medical colleges.
  
  
• In-service quotas for government doctors.
  
  
• Minority reservations in self-financing medical colleges.
  
  

Major Concerns Raised by the TN Government

Minister Subramanian emphasized that the judgment would not impact admissions for 2024 but could have significant ramifications from the next academic year. To address this issue, the TN Government is consulting legal experts to challenge the ruling and restore the 50-50 seat-sharing arrangement.

 

Concerns Raised by Medical Associations 

 

Government doctors in the TN Government have also expressed concerns over the ruling. The Government Doctors’ Association pointed out that premier institutions, including the Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, rely heavily on postgraduate doctors.

 

Implications for the Healthcare Sector 

 

1. Communication Barriers – Doctors from other states might face challenges understanding the local dialect, which can hinder effective treatment.
   
   
2. Workforce Reduction – The TN Government's healthcare workforce could shrink if local doctors cannot secure PG seats.
   
   
3. Healthcare for Underprivileged Patients – Government hospitals serve economically weaker sections who may struggle to communicate with non-local doctors.
   
   

A senior government doctor stated, "Doctors from other states will find it difficult to communicate with patients. This will hamper treatment for poor patients."

Also Read Karnataka State Medical College Seat Distribution, New MBBS Seats in 2025


Legal and Constitutional Aspects 

 

The Supreme Court’s ruling emphasized the principle of equal opportunity across India. The judgment was based on the following key legal perspectives:

1. Uniformity in Rights: All Indian citizens have the right to seek admission to educational institutions across India.
   
   
2. Parliamentary Authority: Only Parliament, not state governments, can prescribe residence-based reservations.
   
   
3. Reservation Limits: PG Courses Domicile Reservations are permitted only at the undergraduate MBBS level, not for specialized PG courses.   
   
   

Potential Consequences and Way Forward

The TN Government remains firm and actively works on legal avenues to contest the ruling. The case has also sparked discussions on how this precedent might affect similar policies across different states.

 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What was the Supreme Court’s ruling on PG Courses Domicile Reservations?

The Supreme Court ruled that PG Courses Domicile Reservations for PG medical courses violate Article 14 of the Constitution and must be discontinued.

2. How will this verdict affect TN Government’s reservation policies?

The verdict challenges the TN Government’s 69% reservation policy, in-service quotas, and minority reservations in medical colleges.

3. Will this ruling impact current medical students?

No, students who have already been admitted under the existing reservation policies will not be affected.

4. What steps is the TN Government taking to challenge the ruling?

The state government is consulting legal experts and plans to file a review petition in the Supreme Court.

5. How does this ruling impact healthcare services in TN Government?

The ruling may reduce the number of local postgraduate doctors, which could impact patient care, especially in government hospitals.

6. What is the significance of the 50-50 seat-sharing model?

TN Government funds PG and super specialty medical education but must share 50% of seats with the All India Quota, which the state considers unfair.

7. How does the TN Government’s review petition succeed?

The success of the review petition will depend on legal arguments and whether the Supreme Court finds merit in the TN Government’s claims of social justice and state rights.

8. How will this ruling impact other states?

Other states with domicile-based reservation policies may also face legal challenges impacting medical education policies nationwide.

TN Government’s challenge to the Supreme Court ruling on domicile-based reservations is a critical legal and policy battle. The state argues that removing these reservations could significantly impact local students, government hospitals, and healthcare services. With legal consultations underway, the state government must restore its previous policies and ensure fair opportunities for its medical students. The coming months will determine the outcome of this significant case, which could have broader implications for medical education and state autonomy in India.

Also Read KEA NEET PG Counselling 2024 Mop-up Round Seat Matrix, Choice Filling